|
I was feeling a pleasant sensation, mixed with an anxious
curiosity, waiting on the first proofs of the
material collected in Paris, on May 2003. The
reason why was that I had used a totally new equipment,
a 35mm panoramic rangefinder, developed by Hasselblad,
the "X-pan". The camera, a novelty that
the friend Zé Abujamra had lent me, was
barely tested before being taken on this trip
to the old continent.
Later, when I saw the prints, the satisfaction
was immediate. I was in front of Parisian everyday
scenes in widescreen format, rich on details and
without any distortion. The new camera was worthy
of the traditional optical quality of the Swedish
brand. But there was still something more, the
images brought me a sense of familiarity. For
some strange reason, they reminded me of some
of the images I took in Rahjastan, back in the
Seventies! So I decided to compose panels combining
scenes of the two countries. I was facing another
social comparison project. But, this time, unlike
the previous two (Afghanistan-Stockholm and Town
and Country), where the panels were formed with
pairs of photos with background and organization
of the elements carefully studied to match, I
wanted something free and untied. Starting by
the images of Paris, which had a different proportion,
India’s would not repeat a pre-established
standard. The images were mainly grouped by affinities
of ideas and objects, and would not necessarily
meet the geometric similarity.
The project was challenging. Time distance between
the catches and the number of alternatives originated
from the choice for a somehow loose layout makes
that each piece demanded a single effort. The
research work on India files, although facilitated
by the scanning project that I’ve developed
with my nephew and partner Eduardo, also demanded
time and attention. But despite, or also by all
this, the result was rewarding. The exhibition
was presented in MARGS in early 2005 and in Uruguay,
the following year. For me, above all, it is a
further evidence on how small is the planet we
live in, as social and cultural differences often
are nothing more than a thin layer of varnish
over beings who carries identical feelings and
that notions about what is beautiful, correct
or good usually are nothing more than mere point
of views.
|